Wrangling the Wild Ones: How to Regain Control of ICAM Investigations Gone Off the Rails

Investigations are rarely predictable. Even with a clear scope, defined terms of reference, and a competent team, things can—and often do—go sideways. For those leading investigations using the ICAM methodology, the pressure to deliver a robust, evidence-based, and timely outcome is immense. But what happens when the process starts slipping off track?

Maybe it’s been weeks, and there’s no progress. Maybe the interviews are spiralling. Or perhaps senior management keeps “checking in” (read: interfering). When ICAM investigations lose traction, stall, or become political hot potatoes, you need tools, strategies, and a calm hand to bring them back in line.

This article explores practical, experience-based advice for regaining control of ICAM investigations that have gone off the rails—and making sure they stay on track.

1. The Tell-Tale Signs an Investigation Is Out of Control

Before you can wrangle an investigation, you need to recognise that it’s gone rogue. Some common indicators include:

• Scope Creep: The Terms of Reference are suddenly blurry, and the team is being asked to investigate more than originally agreed.

• Stakeholder Interference: Leaders start pressuring the team for certain outcomes or to wrap it up quickly.

• Team Fracture: Investigators are not aligned, and the team dynamic is dysfunctional or combative.

• Data Overload: The team is drowning in documents, emails, and technical data with no clear analysis direction.

• Witness Gridlock: Witnesses aren’t cooperating, are too intimidated to talk, or interviews are turning hostile.

• Paralysis by Analysis: Every finding is second-guessed, and the team struggles to make sense of evidence.

If one or more of these apply, you’re no longer in control—you’re reacting. And that’s a dangerous place to be in any investigative context.

2. Step One: Re-establish the Foundations

If your ICAM investigation is in chaos, go back to the basics.

a. Revisit the Terms of Reference (ToR)

The ToR isn’t just paperwork—it’s your anchor. Re-review it and ask:

• Are we still working within the scope?

• Has someone unofficially widened the goalposts?

• Do all team members know what the investigation is (and isn’t) supposed to achieve?

If scope creep has occurred, formally revise the ToR or push back. Document everything. This protects the team and reinforces independence.

b. Reconfirm Roles and Responsibilities

Remind everyone of their role. The lead investigator facilitates and guides—not does everything. Technical advisors advise. Admins support. Don’t let roles bleed into each other.

Recalibrate any team member who’s overstepping or disengaged.

c. Rebuild the Timeline

Create (or recreate) a timeline of key events—from the incident itself to where the investigation is now. This helps visualise:

• Missed milestones

• Overdue actions

• Points of escalation

It’s also a powerful communication tool to show stakeholders how you’ll move forward.

3. Contain the External Pressure

Investigations can attract attention, especially if the incident was high-profile. But pressure from execs, legal, unions, or media shouldn’t dictate your methodology or pace.

a. Push Back—Professionally

If a leader is asking for daily updates or steering outcomes, politely but firmly redirect:

“We’re following a structured methodology that ensures we examine all contributing factors. Rushing compromises that. I’ll provide a progress update on Friday with confirmed evidence and initial analysis.”

Be transparent, but don’t be swayed.

b. Use the ICAM Framework as a Shield

Let ICAM do the heavy lifting. Reaffirm that:

• It’s a systemic methodology

• It avoids blame

• It identifies organisational factors, not just errors

This keeps the investigation anchored in learning and process improvement, not scapegoating or political agendas.

4. Get the Team Back on Track

Investigators are human. Frustration, burnout, and confusion are common when things stall. Take time to regroup and reset the team.

a. Call a Time-Out

Bring the team together for a reset meeting:

• Review the current status

• Identify roadblocks

• Reconfirm methodology (PEEPO, Event/Condition Analysis, Barrier Analysis, etc.)

• Reassign or reprioritise tasks

Sometimes, simply pausing and reorienting can restore energy and focus.

b. Deal with the Disrupters

If someone on the team is undermining the process by dominating discussions, leaking information, or second-guessing findings, it needs to be addressed directly.

Have a one-on-one. Be clear:

“We need a cohesive team that respects the process. I’m relying on you to support that.”

If needed, escalate or replace. It’s better to have a smaller, aligned team than a large, dysfunctional one.

5. Fix the Witness Process

Interviews are often where investigations derail. If they’re not yielding useful insights—or worse, becoming adversarial—it’s time to recalibrate.

a. Start with Free Recall

Re-establish this best practice if it’s fallen by the wayside. Let the witness tell their story without interruption. It builds trust, reveals context, and often surfaces unexpected insights.

b. Create a Safe Environment

If witnesses are fearful, offer reassurance:

• Interviews are not disciplinary

• You’re there to understand the situation, not assign blame

• Responses are confidential within the investigative process

Never conduct interviews in high-stress areas like control rooms or in front of others. Privacy matters.

c. Re-brief and Debrief Investigators

Train (or retrain) the team on:

• Questioning techniques

• Avoiding leading questions

• Staying neutral

• Managing emotional responses

If interviews have become a sticking point, bring in an experienced facilitator to lead or observe and provide feedback.

6. Simplify the Evidence Analysis

Mountains of data can overwhelm even experienced teams. Instead of “boiling the ocean,” prioritise:

• What is directly relevant to the sequence of events?

• What challenges or supports the presence of barriers?

• What connects to the key PEEPO elements?

Use the timeline to tell the story.

These help structure thought and reveal patterns. A messy whiteboard can be more useful than a 100-page PDF.

7. Reframe the Communication Strategy

If you’ve lost control of the messaging, reclaim it.

a. Reset Stakeholder Expectations

Let them know:

• What’s been done

• What’s next

• When to expect findings

Avoid “ongoing investigation” black holes. A brief, regular update (e.g., every Friday) can prevent stakeholders from chasing you, or worse, making up their own narrative.

b. Control the Report Drafting Process

Don’t write the report last-minute. Begin drafting as you analyse. Capture findings early. Don’t let stakeholders write it for you. It’s an independent investigation, not a management PR piece.

8. Know When to Escalate

Sometimes, despite best efforts, control can’t be regained. In these rare cases:

• Escalate formally: to senior leaders, legal, or regulators if needed.

• Document everything: especially interference, resource constraints, or obstruction.

• Request a reset: including new ToR or investigator reassignment.

This protects your credibility and the integrity of the process.

9. Learn From the Chaos

Once the investigation is complete, don’t move on immediately. Hold a review session with the team.

• What went wrong?

• What helped?

• How could the investigation process be improved?

• Were there any surprises in team dynamics, stakeholder behaviour, or data gaps?

Capture those lessons in a continuous improvement log. Over time, you’ll build a playbook for managing complex or high-risk investigations with confidence.

10. Prevention Is Better Than Recovery

The best way to deal with out-of-control ICAM investigations? Stop them from going off the rails in the first place. Here’s how:

• Robust Planning: Spend time on your ToR and team selection.

• Strong Facilitation: Have a clear lead, confident in ICAM, human factors, and stakeholder management.

• Regular Checkpoints: Build internal milestones to catch problems early.

• Training: Ensure all investigators understand ICAM—not just the forms, but the thinking behind it.

• Clear Communication: Set the tone early with stakeholders about process, timing, and independence.

Conclusion: It’s Not Just an Investigation—It’s Leadership in Action

Leading a complex ICAM investigation is more than a technical exercise. It’s a leadership challenge. It demands clarity, calmness, neutrality, and courage.

When things go wrong—and they will—you don’t need to panic. You need a plan.

So, the next time your investigation starts to veer off course, remember:

• Anchor back to the methodology.

• Communicate clearly and often.

• Reset your team and your stakeholders.

• Let ICAM do the work—it’s built for complexity.

The messiest investigations often reveal the deepest insights—if you can wrangle them back on track.

Want to Stay Up To Date On Investigations? 

Stay up to date with our newsletter, From Incident to Insight- subscribe now at https://www.linkedin.com/build-relation/newsletter-follow?entityUrn=7353241564401356800